The rottenness of the "yellow" pseudo-progressivists
Regarding the 2011 UE Student Council Elections, and the "Kaisa Ka" Stooges
Last February, students of the University of the East were participating in a process involving the selection of officers, representatives, leaders willing to serve for the interest of the UE community. This process signifies the student's right to vote and choose who's their promising leader but...
Despite all the votes, of playing in computer screens and carelessly doing "irresponsible" voting, it seemed that it end up on a side that is, detrimental to the will of the students. And these people who are allegedly "won" were as if rejoiced and felt that they are getting contented in their policies that was and is, short term.
Obviously, these people tried enough to use every hodge-podge of rhetoric trying to curry favor away to the majority, using pseudo-progressive sentiment yet they failed to fulfill every part of its phrase being spoken. Yes, that they even failed to oppose the 5% increase proposed by the administration, accepted and even justified in in front of the people-reminiscent of the yellow unions who tried to justify their cause that is meaningless and against the will of the workers; and if they ought to oppose-perhaps too limited for they are contented in their so-called "diplomacy", "lobbying", "negotiation" or rather capitulation.
Personally to say, I found it to them as too desperate to maintain after 3 years since 2008. Yes, that there are certain changes like fresh coated paint, chairs, freebees like free Wi-Fi and everything, but despite these kinds of things around in UE, how come there's a large drop-out rate, increase in tuition and in other fees 5% and being not transparent in front of the studentry? Isn't it obvious that they are satisfying their appetites coming from the profits accumulated by the administration regardless of the crisis instead of opposing it? Telling to us, especially those with working class backgrounds on justifying their actions, of being passive and getting contented? If these remained tolerated then is there any change?
Well...
Back to the topic, their reign justifies the administration's control in everything around UE. During that time, most of my comrades felt sad and angry about the results-imagine how the Commission on Elections and its technical support seeming doing a "dirty job" in order to defeat a progressive student party like KBPA? To make a passive leader like Alec win the USC presidency? Using their actions as evidences, the way they speak and lack of transparency, it seemed that they made fools out of us and even the studentry itself, or to say it wholly-that the system was obviously interfering on that election day-as the progressive movements in UE steadily growing?
These events, actions gave a benefit of the doubt in looking at the numbers, results, the statistic taken on that "successful" event, but how come there are larger turnouts out of it? According to a COMELEC member, he admitted that despite the "successful" process, turnouts remained bigger especially in the Colleges of Business Administration, Arts and Sciences, Education,and in the Computer Sciences and Systems (the former Secretarial School). If tolerated, then it obviously wanting for the system to dissuade the studentry to vote-especially in a political party adhering to genuine student power, militant and patriotic? Again, these events really gave me a time to think much about them, is it because of the actions related to the elections? Perhaps yes, but how come despite supporting KBPA, more and more yet being "defeated" by a yellow, weakling stooges? Of random whatsoever shown in the screen as its proof?
God... these yellow stooges were simply done their cooking. They even had 1 watcher, then a controlled office, but did they control much of the studentry? All through short term stupidity?
To tell frankly, that despite their so-called victory happened last 28 of February, these are merely forlorn hopes to get in touch with the studentry, but they don't even care about the crisis after all. Through agreeing the proposed 5% TOFI and other system-related acts, perhaps it shows how stupid they are- yet desperate in having a victory all for their goddamn sake. And if they continue to prevail, tolerating their short-term nonsense and long-term apathy, perhaps there is an option liable for us, that in their succeeding plans there is a stand responding to their call:
BOYCOTT THEIR MOVES!
BOMBARD THE HEADQUARTERS!
