KCNA: Who Wire-pulled Shocking Case behind Scene
Pyongyang, May 28 (KCNA) -- Many days have passed since the case of "Cheonan" occurred but the south Korean puppet authorities are going beyond the tolerance limit in their racket of confrontation with the DPRK.
Quite many people have expressed their understanding of a lot of information provided by the relevant institutions of the DPRK several times to prove the irrefutable facts and the hard reality that there was no reason for the DPRK to get involved in such case. But the puppet group is getting more reckless as the days go by in its confrontation hysteria. Then why? It is behaving so because it firmly believes in somebody's strong backing.
But for the patronage and prodding of its master, the south Korean puppet group would have not gone the lengths of recklessly crying out for "retaliation" and declaring "it would not rule out even a war" after daring to brand the DPRK as a "criminal" like puppies knowing no fear of a tiger. It is the United States that is behind the case of "Cheonan".
The case was cooked up and the "results of investigation" into it were published with the approval of the U.S. and under its patronage and manipulation from A to Z.
The investigation was steered by the U.S. from its very outset. It approached the joint investigation from the standpoint hostile to the DPRK and branded it as a "suspect," asserting that "there was hardly any other "suspect except north Korea" and "the warship was most probably sunken by a torpedo attack of north Korea" even before truth about the case was probed. The investigation was led by it in that direction.
The U.S. reaction to the recent sinking of the warship was so excessive as to sound strange.
After the publication of the "results of investigation" the U.S. zealously egged the puppet authorities on to adopt a high-handed policy of confrontation, jabbering that they are "considerably trustworthy" and that it extends full support to the publication of their claim that the warship was "sunken by a torpedo attack of the north." It styled itself a guardian of the Lee Myung Bak conservative group, terming the case as somebody's "act of aggression" and "challenge" to international peace and security.
No sooner had the "results of investigation" were announced than the U.S. issued a statement in support of them. In the wake of traitor Lee Myung Bak's issue of "statement to the people," high-ranking officials of Washington vied with each other in clarifying their stand for "policy cooperation" and "maintenance of cooperation. " Ill-famed tricksters of the Departments of State and Defense and the CIA put their heads together to jointly orchestrate a new farce.
On May 25, a spokesman for the National Security Council of the U.S. blustered that north Korea should admit its attack on warship "Cheonan" and the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations made no scruple of making such reckless remarks as seriously misjudging the trend of the present situation by uttering that measures for all-out confrontation with fellow countrymen made public by the south Korean puppet authorities were appropriate in view of the situation.
The Command of the 8th U.S. imperialist aggressor army in south Korea has kept itself fully ready for aggression on the DPRK in order to act a "command of conducting war." The commander of the U.S. naval force in south Korea was closeted with the chief of the general staff of the south Korean puppet navy over the issues of staging a joint anti-submarine exercise within the next month and "maneuvers for intercepting ships in waters within the framework of the PSI" within the latter half of this year.
The Obama administration is using the above-said case for stirring up the atmosphere of "international cooperation" through the increased role of south Korea as its servant for the purposes of escalating instability in the Asia-Pacific region, containing big powers and emerging unchallenged in the region.
This is the ulterior motive of the U.S. acting a strong guardian of the south Korean puppet regime in the warship case.
The hostile actions taken by the U.S. after the occurrence of the case are a wanton encroachment upon the DPRK's fundamental interests.
The U.S. would be well advised to behave itself, mindful of the grave consequences to be entailed by its actions.
Quite many people have expressed their understanding of a lot of information provided by the relevant institutions of the DPRK several times to prove the irrefutable facts and the hard reality that there was no reason for the DPRK to get involved in such case. But the puppet group is getting more reckless as the days go by in its confrontation hysteria. Then why? It is behaving so because it firmly believes in somebody's strong backing.
But for the patronage and prodding of its master, the south Korean puppet group would have not gone the lengths of recklessly crying out for "retaliation" and declaring "it would not rule out even a war" after daring to brand the DPRK as a "criminal" like puppies knowing no fear of a tiger. It is the United States that is behind the case of "Cheonan".
The case was cooked up and the "results of investigation" into it were published with the approval of the U.S. and under its patronage and manipulation from A to Z.
The investigation was steered by the U.S. from its very outset. It approached the joint investigation from the standpoint hostile to the DPRK and branded it as a "suspect," asserting that "there was hardly any other "suspect except north Korea" and "the warship was most probably sunken by a torpedo attack of north Korea" even before truth about the case was probed. The investigation was led by it in that direction.
The U.S. reaction to the recent sinking of the warship was so excessive as to sound strange.
After the publication of the "results of investigation" the U.S. zealously egged the puppet authorities on to adopt a high-handed policy of confrontation, jabbering that they are "considerably trustworthy" and that it extends full support to the publication of their claim that the warship was "sunken by a torpedo attack of the north." It styled itself a guardian of the Lee Myung Bak conservative group, terming the case as somebody's "act of aggression" and "challenge" to international peace and security.
No sooner had the "results of investigation" were announced than the U.S. issued a statement in support of them. In the wake of traitor Lee Myung Bak's issue of "statement to the people," high-ranking officials of Washington vied with each other in clarifying their stand for "policy cooperation" and "maintenance of cooperation. " Ill-famed tricksters of the Departments of State and Defense and the CIA put their heads together to jointly orchestrate a new farce.
On May 25, a spokesman for the National Security Council of the U.S. blustered that north Korea should admit its attack on warship "Cheonan" and the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations made no scruple of making such reckless remarks as seriously misjudging the trend of the present situation by uttering that measures for all-out confrontation with fellow countrymen made public by the south Korean puppet authorities were appropriate in view of the situation.
The Command of the 8th U.S. imperialist aggressor army in south Korea has kept itself fully ready for aggression on the DPRK in order to act a "command of conducting war." The commander of the U.S. naval force in south Korea was closeted with the chief of the general staff of the south Korean puppet navy over the issues of staging a joint anti-submarine exercise within the next month and "maneuvers for intercepting ships in waters within the framework of the PSI" within the latter half of this year.
The Obama administration is using the above-said case for stirring up the atmosphere of "international cooperation" through the increased role of south Korea as its servant for the purposes of escalating instability in the Asia-Pacific region, containing big powers and emerging unchallenged in the region.
This is the ulterior motive of the U.S. acting a strong guardian of the south Korean puppet regime in the warship case.
The hostile actions taken by the U.S. after the occurrence of the case are a wanton encroachment upon the DPRK's fundamental interests.
The U.S. would be well advised to behave itself, mindful of the grave consequences to be entailed by its actions.
